@Substance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 month agoCome and take itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square251fedilinkarrow-up11.14K
arrow-up11.14KimageCome and take itlemmy.world@Substance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square251fedilink
minus-square@curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink7•1 month agoIn the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army. As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
minus-squareTb0n3linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoI’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
In the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army.
As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
I’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
Why not both?
Removed by mod