@Gork@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 month agoCore 2 Ruleofiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1850
arrow-up1850imageCore 2 Ruleofiles.catbox.moe@Gork@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 month agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-square@NewNewAccount@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink12•1 month ago5400 rpm was very common. 7200 were the performance drives.
minus-square@BeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilink2•1 month agoAs I remember around 2007, 5400 RPM was frowned upon in builds. The disks I have from that time is a WD RE2 (very noisy 7200 RPM) and a few WD Green’s (I think they are slower than 5400 RPM just to mess with my arguments).
minus-square@trigonated@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 month agoAnd if you wanted very high performance, you could go with a 10000rpm one.
5400 rpm was very common. 7200 were the performance drives.
As I remember around 2007, 5400 RPM was frowned upon in builds.
The disks I have from that time is a WD RE2 (very noisy 7200 RPM) and a few WD Green’s (I think they are slower than 5400 RPM just to mess with my arguments).
And if you wanted very high performance, you could go with a 10000rpm one.