Unruffled [he/him]M to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 3 months agoFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1537file-textcross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
arrow-up1537imageFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostUnruffled [he/him]M to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square83fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
minus-square@Prunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoBecause that’s what you’re implying.
minus-square@Prunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoYes you are: “We” cannot stop human beings from gaining power over others so the question is moot.
minus-square@rah@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoI see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase: “We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
minus-square@Prunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoNo one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
minus-square@rah@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months ago No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
minus-square@Prunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoSo you admit it’s personal rather than topical, cool.
Because that’s what you’re implying.
I’m neither saying nor implying that.
Yes you are:
I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase:
“We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation.
Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
Got it, you’re refusing to engage.
With you only.
So you admit it’s personal rather than topical, cool.