• sushibowl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    The thing is, I always thought that you steer politicians through your vote

    To some extent, yes. However the amount of steering you can do this way is rather limited, since a vote only indicates a preference of one candidate over the other.

    For example, if you decide to vote Republican out of protest, Democrats might conclude that you like republican policies, and to win your vote back, they need to move even further right. If you decide to stay home and not vote, you don’t really give any information to democrats what they actually need to do. They may decide that you are an unlikely voter in any case, and focus towards those folks most likely to turn out (that’s generally older white conservative folks).

    One option is to vote for some leftist third party. This sends a pretty clear message about what policies you like. The problem is that, apart from the messaging, your vote is almost certainly wasted. You are in effect helping your enemy win in the short term.

    The other option is to engage politically outside of just voting. Most people have been convinced by establishment politicians that your only influence is your vote. This is not true. Protests, activism, grassroots movements, local politics are all effective ways to steer your preferred party in your preferred direction. This does require substantially more effort.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why are we so preoccupied with ensuring the party we hate most loses, rather than focusing on the party you want most winning.

      I’d rather everyone vote closest to their actual morals and values, and give no consideration to who loses.

      If we keep fighting over who’s the biggest loser, how can we possibly expect things to improve?

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well I disagree that my view isnt possible. It very much is, and is likely the only way to break the two party system to begin with.

          Other than that we would have to convince politicians to give away power, which is very unlikely.

          And I already voted for Kamala but she wasnt the best choice for me by much, and I’m not saying trump was second. But that has more to do with the state I’m in than anything. If I was a county over I would have voted for a third party.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              My view has as much weight as yours, neither of our positions has been proven to lead to long term change, but at least mine hasnt been tried over and over like yours has been.

              I guess we will just have to keep waiting for the magical election where its not the end of the country if the republicans win.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  What exactly gives your idea weight? What is your idea to change from the current system to a better one again? I’m sure you have a proven model for this right? Or do you know just as little as I do about how to reform the two party system into something better?

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        And also when the democrats win, if you look at the way policy has evolved during the clinton years, during the obama years, and also now during the biden years.