• @Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 days ago

      Stand your ground laws disagree. If one party views it as a threat of bodily harm they can definitely defend themselves by preemptively killing someone.

      • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        22 days ago

        This was such a weird time-line switch. Trump president again and progressives on Lemmy sound like r/conservative with law interpretation. So there’s no better response, no room for the very real needed evaluation of each situation, just a blanket “shoot em” now. Idk how people are so subjective to propaganda and influence when we have such a hard grasp on reality.

        • @Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 days ago

          A bunch of women shooting men for threatening to rape them would definitely get the stand your ground laws changed for the better. Sounds like a progressive win to me.

          Reality is a strange bedfellow.

          • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            22 days ago

            Just an OG fantasy accelerationist eh? I can dig it, but I think they would dismiss it as not being fit for the definition. Judges can and are allowed to be fickle like that.

            • @Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              It would be wonderful to set the precedent that men can legally defend themselves but woman can’t. Let’s hope for fickle justices who can’t help themselves.