• @StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    912 hours ago

    Yeah, you’re not making any sense. How is the recyclability of nuclear fuel rods an excuse to keep burning fossil fuels? That’s a massive leap in logic that demands an explanation.

    • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1012 hours ago

      They’re saying that plausible uses don’t necessarily translate to real world use, in practice. I have no stake in this, just translating

      • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        612 hours ago

        While I understand where they’re coming from, it should be noted that they’re likely basing their experience with recyclability on plastic recycling which is totally a shit show. The big difference comes in when you realize that plastic is cheap as shit whereas uranium fuel rods are not.