• spaceghotiOP
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    FTA:

    After the Civil War, Congress overrode the veto of then-President Andrew Johnson to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which declared people “of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude” who are born in the United States to be citizens.

    Sounds pretty fundamental to me.

    • Umbra
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      More Like utterly irrelevant for over 150 years

      • spaceghotiOP
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        The principle, enshrined into law in 1866, has granted citizenship to countless people for over two hundred years. How do you get “irrelevant” from that?

          • spaceghotiOP
            link
            41 year ago

            Several hundred years of legal precedent disagree with you. Please tell me, since you know better: what was its “true” purpose?

            • Umbra
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Its purpose was to grant former slaves citizenship.

              • BraveSirZaphod
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                So weird they forgot to add in a “born in the United States before 1865” clause if that’s what they meant. What a bunch of dummies!

              • spaceghotiOP
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                It can’t possibly have had more than one purpose? Especially given the broad language used that explicitly covered all people born here?

                This is a truly extraordinary insight. Who knows how many judges have been ruling incorrectly, and here you come clarifying it for us all! Truly, you are a gift to us all.

      • hoodatninja
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure the courts decide that and, so far, they’ve decided it’s pretty dang relevant.

      • @Bumblefumble@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Would you say that about everything in the constitution then? The second amendment? I mean if something is so ingrained in the nation historically, it’s hard to dismiss that just because you dislike it.

        • Umbra
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          No, the only point of birthright citizenship was to grant former slaves citizenship. That’s not a founding anything