maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1207cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1207external-linkFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgmaegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square67fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squarelaylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNo but a previous history of making shit up and falsifying data along with a failure to replicate?
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoThey don’t have a history of making stuff up. Just because one group did doesn’t automatically mean everyone else is. The probability that something is made up doesn’t change just because somebody previously did or did not make something up.
minus-squareErk@cdda.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoJeez you seem like you have some personal vendetta against this lab
No but a previous history of making shit up and falsifying data along with a failure to replicate?
They don’t have a history of making stuff up. Just because one group did doesn’t automatically mean everyone else is. The probability that something is made up doesn’t change just because somebody previously did or did not make something up.
Jeez you seem like you have some personal vendetta against this lab