• Whiskey Pickle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Mods on the Star Trek communities on StarTrek.world will delete (and ban you) for even the slightest negative opinion about the show Star Trek Discovery. Even if you say that you dislike the show, or that you think the writing is sub-par, or anything slightly minor and inoffensive, poof! Your comment is gone, and you’re banned.

    It’s not a rule in the sidebar, which is most frustrating, too. All you get is “not constructive”, even though there are plenty of complaints about other things, some pretty abrasive. But one unadoring word about Discovery, and you and your comment vanish without warning.

    • @reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s because that sub was basically moved from Reddit to the fediverse.

      The nice thing about the fediverse is you can start a separate uncensored star trek sub and they can’t do anything about it (unlike how they got alternatives shut down on Reddit).

      • @OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah the thing that really pissed me off is how they got r/star_trek shut down. Not only could you not have an honest conversation about something you love on the official sub, when someone makes an alternative for that specific reason they still just can’t let people have it. There was a lot of criticism of the r/startrek mods on there for a while, admittedly, but they deserve it. It’s pathetic.

        It’s because that sub was basically moved from Reddit to the fediverse and resides on the actual Star Trek website. Just proves the rumor that CBS/Paramount has been influencing it all along.

        Well shit.

      • @bauhaus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        Check it: !startrek@lemmy.ml

        it’s not a new community, but I just joined the mod team and I’ve updated the community guidelines in this Community Update post. It’s more permissive and, I think, much more reasonable and transparent. Coe on over, and help revitalize the community!

        Live long and prosper! 🖖

    • @alokir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s why I unsubbed from r/startrek on Reddit. I wasn’t banned but I’ve seen many threads deleted that had genuine criticism of Discovery.

      I didn’t stick around long enough to see if they behaved the same way with Picard, but my guess is yes.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The stupid thing is that the criticism is entirely valid. The fact that Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks are so good, basically proves that it isn’t a problem with new trek, just their stupid “gritty” interpretation of it.

        Although in fairness Picard gets better when it just becomes more TNG. But you have this weird slog to get through before you get there, where for some reason Jean-Luc Picard is hanging out in some universe that’s got nothing to do with Star Trek and feels like Mass Effect the TV show or something with all its melodrama.

      • @bauhaus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        Check it: !startrek@lemmy.ml

        it’s not a new community, but I just joined the mod team and I’ve updated the community guidelines in this Community Update post. It’s more permissive and, I think, much more reasonable and transparent. Coe on over, and help revitalize the community!

        Live long and prosper! 🖖

    • @bauhaus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      Good news!

      I’ve just been added t the mod team over at !startrek@lemmy.ml and have posted a Community Update with new community guidelines that outline a more open policy on discussions that includes the ability to express criticism without fear of your comments vanishing or being capriciously banned without warning.

      However, there are (as outlined in the post) some guidelines about how those discussions should go. We don’t want unhinged rants about how you hate X that just devolve into toxic threads. If you’re going to be critical, make it constructive criticism that fosters civil discussion, and keep it relevant to the post you’re commenting on. Irrelevant tangents and a lot of toxicity will be curtailed. But, otherwise, we feel it would be disingenuous and dishonest to outright ban all dissenting opinions and the discussion of when Trek sometimes fails to hit its mark.

      Rules are in the sidebar, and if you have any questions or comments, you can comment on the Community Update post, reply to this comment, or contact me!

      Live long and prosper! 🖖

      • Whiskey Pickle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        Oh, now that is good news! It looks like the community has been quiet/mostly inactive for a while, but has 3x the subscriber count as that other community! I’ve subscribed, and I’ll see what I can do about helping to make it more active!

        woohoo!