• Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I am not exactly sure what I am missing?

    Before, you could write “I don’t like gay people” and get banned for it. Now you won’t get banned for that post, unless you use a slur.

    At least, that’s my interpretation of it. Maybe it’s a bit overblown, maybe it’s a misstep by Jayclees, I dunno. I don’t think a whole lot of people are really using Squabblr for conversational content in the first place, though. 99% of the platform is just memes. They should just stick to that, honestly. Nothing wrong with being a 9gag replacement.

    If he wants to let people have dissenting opinions, then he should at least add a downvote mechanic to the platform. Otherwise it will be riddled with bad-faith arguments and brigading.

    • @ashenblood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      Good context, I didn’t realize they don’t have downvotes. That changes things a bit, the downvote is a fairly necessary mechanic for facilitating any type of serious discussion online.

      But I’m still curious if anyone can rationally explain why saying “I don’t like gay people” is worthy of a ban? Personally I would never say that, because it’s an idiotic statement. But why is that unacceptable for someone to say?

      There’s a very simple response… “Why not?”. And depending how they respond to that, they could definitely end up in banworthy territory. Or perhaps they might respond with an obvious misconception that could present an opportunity to educate someone on their ignorance.

      • @bucho
        link
        English
        1011 months ago

        But I’m still curious if anyone can rationally explain why saying “I don’t like gay people” is worthy of a ban?

        Because that is an absurd reduction, and not based in reality. In reality, nobody got banned for saying: “I don’t like gay people”. What people were saying was so much worse. Hell, even describing the issue as homophobia is absurdly reductive. While I’m in no way saying homophobia isn’t a thing anymore, it’s much less of a hot-button issue among deplorables than it was 10 years ago. These days, they mostly focus on whether or not trans people exist, and how bad they’re allowed to make trans people’s lives before it constitutes “hate speech”.

        Make no mistake, this change in site terms will absolutely mean a rise in bigoted shit being posted there. That’s the MO of bigots: they say and do awful things, then try to gaslight you into thinking that really, what they said and / or did was not that bad, and besides, it’s free speech, innit? Managing an internet community is a never-ending fight against hordes of awful people who constantly try to turn that space into the next version of 8chan. You give Nazis an inch, next thing you know, they’re taking Poland.

        • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          These days saying “biological sex exists” gets you banned on Reddit and even on some instances here going by the mod logs.

          • @bucho
            link
            English
            811 months ago

            These days saying “biological sex exists” gets you banned on Reddit

            No it doesn’t. That is another absurd reduction. Are you intentionally lying, or do you actually believe your own hyperbole?

            Nobody, and I do mean nobody, would dispute that “biological sex exists”. That is a ridiculous straw man. What all of the people who are educated on the topic will say is that biological sex and gender are two different things. What bigots and morons hear is “Hurr durr biological sex doesn’t exist”.

            • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              411 months ago

              Yes it absolutely does. No amount of calling it a straw man will change this. People absolutely are now saying that biological sex isn’t a thing - you only need to look at “assigned male/female at birth”. No one is “assigned” a sex at birth, it’s observed.

              Try throwing gaslighting out there next too, that usually goes hand in hand with straw man.

              • @bucho
                link
                English
                811 months ago

                Yes it absolutely does. No amount of calling it a straw man will change this.

                Ok, so delusional enough to believe your own hyperbole, then. Got it. Straight up crazy with a persecution complex.

                No one is “assigned” a sex at birth, it’s observed.

                Yes. Biological sex is observed, and then written on the birth certificate. Or in other words, “assigned”. Also, there are occasions when someone is born intersex, and the doctor chooses. Well documented cases of this happening.

                Try throwing gaslighting out there next too, that usually goes hand in hand with straw man.

                Well, sorry if my using the terms accurately offends you, snowflake. But if you’re gonna say crazy, irrelevant shit, and then pretend that it’s neither crazy nor irrelevant, you kind of have to live with the consequences of people calling you a gaslighter. Comes with the territory.

                • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Yes. Biological sex is observed, and then written on the birth certificate. Or in other words, “assigned”.

                  It can’t be observed and assigned at the same time. No one is assigned a sex. Even if a doctor doesn’t write it on a birth certificate you’re still the sex that matches your chromosomes. The terms “AMAB” and “AFAB” were literally made to deny that biological sex exists lol. They literally mean “the doctor chose that I am a male or a female despite what I actually am” rather than “the doctor observed that I am a male/female”.

                  Well, sorry if my using the terms accurately offends you, snowflake.

                  Aww now you’re getting upset and reverting to name calling lol. Definitely shows that you’re winning the argument.

                  Also lol like clockwork with the intersex argument. Intersex people are a literal genetic deformity. They make up an insanely low fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percentage of the population.

                  • @bucho
                    link
                    English
                    611 months ago

                    It can’t be observed and assigned at the same time. No one is assigned a sex.

                    So, your big argument against the existence of trans people is semantics? Really? I’m telling you what assigned means when people say “assigned male/female at birth”. I didn’t make up the term. It’s one that is in common parlance. You’re so smugly wrapped up in nits to pick that you’re missing the forest for the trees.

                    The terms “AMAB” and “AFAB” were literally made to deny that biological sex exists lol

                    No. Incorrect. And stupid, and crazy. Nobody is denying that biological sex exists. I have no idea why you insist on pretending that they are.

                    Seriously, are you so insecure that you have to make up things to feel persecuted about? How pathetic are you?

                    They literally mean “the doctor chose that I am a male or a female despite what I actually am”

                    Again, biological sex and gender are two completely different things. Most of the time, they’re related, but not always. Which is why someone with XY chromosomes and a penis who is assigned male at birth can have the gender identity of female. It happens. Denying that is denying reality. Of course, you seem to want to choose to invent some fantasy world and then get offended when reality doesn’t match it, so I’m not sure why I’m even taking the time of day to explain this shit to you. It’s not even going to make it through your thick skull.

                    Aww now you’re getting upset and reverting to name calling lol. Definitely shows that you’re winning the argument.

                    If describing you accurately is “name calling”, then yes. I’m name calling. You’re a snowflake. A stupid, crazy, immature snowflake. You can choose to not be one any time you’d like, but you seem to enjoy being one, so I’m not sure why you’d act all surprised when people call you out for it. Probably ties back to that whole persecution complex you’ve got. Poor little innocent victim. Aww.

                    Also lol like clockwork with the intersex argument. Intersex people are a literal genetic deformity. They make up an insanely low fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percentage of the population.

                    Did I ever claim that they weren’t? Why is it that you’re ok with the idea that some intersex people exist while denying that some trans people exist? Is it because you can’t see the differences with your eyes? Are you really so stupid that you believe that if you can’t see it, it doesn’t exist? Do you also believe that dyslexia doesn’t exist?

                    The point is, we are insanely complicated organisms. Within the human spectrum exist vast amounts of variation. Some people are born intersex. Some people are born trans. Some people are born straight. Your stubborn refusal to see that says way more about you than it does about humanity.

    • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      If he wants to let people have dissenting opinions, then he should at least add a downvote mechanic to the platform.

      No, upvoting and downvoting needs to go away because it’s just used to brigade and reinforce the circle jerk popular narrative.

      All places like this should have are the options to report a post and to block/ignore/mute a poster. Those 2 options give everyone the ability to self moderate.