Just gonna leave this here.

  • ch1cken
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Quite the opposite, brave’s defaults are very good. An alternative to brave on the firefox side would be librewolf, which gives firefox great defaults, but the issue with that is that they disabled auto updates, and there’s still a lot of people on the windows side not using a package manager (even though many exist).

    bullshit integrated into it.

    And again, there’s no “bullshit” if you don’t explicitly opt into the crypto.

      • SaltySalamander
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        They are constantly bugging you to sign up for it

        No, the browser asks you once.

      • linearchaos
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I run it secondary to Firefox when I need to use IPFS, have been for about 6 months now. I also occasionally use it because it also blocks Youtube ads by default, AND when combined with privacy badger, it is the only browser that still works while giving half decent anti-fingerprinting. Firefox, Chrome, nothing else even gets close. They just straight up lie about your screen rez and plugins to keep you from being fingerprinted.

        Their account sync is pretty nice. Encrypted P2P syncing of configs and bookmarks. No need to make an account with them to store your settings.

        Yeah, if you use their new tab page, there’s an crypto option there which you can remove. Their new tab page sucks and I don’t use it anyway.

        There is ONE crypto button to the right of the URL bar, which you can right click and hide. The other stuff is actually the controls for their PWA install , share and privacy/ad block settings. You can just run full block everywhere and flick off the extra blocking for a site if it’s a problem.

        I also refuse to use their search, but it does work really well last time I tried it. DDG is good enough and the smaller the company selling my data, the better.

        Updates don’t generate any crypto popups for me, perhaps because I don’t use their front page.

        It’s open source, so they at the very least aren’t hiding what they’re doing.

        The fact that they offer shitty crypto with hideable buttons should be the least of your objections.

        They replaced webpage ads with their own when you enable bat. (I don’t crypto so I don’t see those)

        They swapped referrer links on unreferred things to make money. (which is sunset now, but is an indicator of how they DGAF)

        They used their crypto as a pyramid scheme to sell to investors, even got in trouble over it with the Government.

        Once their crypto pyramid scheme fails, They’ll either fold up, or double down on selling data passed through them.

        They have an insecure TOR implementation

        They are likely to sell your data

        They are likely to sell your data to AI projects.

        Their CEO is a POS, but that’s hardly unusual these days.

    • QHC
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      and there’s still a lot of people on the windows side not using a package manager

      I think “lots of people” here can just be simplified to “nearly everyone”. Anyone that is ware of a package manager and why it’s useful and thinks to look for an equivalent for Windows is not going to be bothered by a few extra configuration steps.