earlyadopter@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoDesigners vs Programmerssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up190
arrow-up190imageDesigners vs Programmerssh.itjust.worksearlyadopter@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareKnighthawk 0811linkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agobut that’s exactly how the models are being trained. by manually going through all the images and describing them. and you can’t really complain that computers go through data at a greater scale than humans… that’s the whole point. that argument doesn’t hold
minus-squarezalack@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-22 years agoIt’s worth entertaining the observation that these learning models piggyback off underpaid human effort to funnel wealth towards the 1%. It’s just that the solution isn’t to stop the tech. That never works. It’s out in the world now. The real solution is much harder. We need to overhaul our economy and put in mechanisms to recirculate wealth downwards.
but that’s exactly how the models are being trained. by manually going through all the images and describing them.
and you can’t really complain that computers go through data at a greater scale than humans… that’s the whole point. that argument doesn’t hold
It’s worth entertaining the observation that these learning models piggyback off underpaid human effort to funnel wealth towards the 1%.
It’s just that the solution isn’t to stop the tech. That never works. It’s out in the world now.
The real solution is much harder. We need to overhaul our economy and put in mechanisms to recirculate wealth downwards.