• @GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I love that y’all use that as an insult. It only carries any weight in your own echo chamber, you know that right? No where else on the planet (be it a forum or a physical space) does that mean anything. Well, maybe within north korea

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        351 year ago

        If “on the planet” you mean primarily the U.S and secondarily the rest of the “west” while excluding the majority of humanity on the planet, then sure.

        You’re so brainwashed and conditioned into believing you have more in common with some ghoul billionaire that values your life insofar as much as they can extract wealth out of you than your own fellow worker.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          Obligatory comment that brainwashing is a myth rooted in orientalism and later pseudoscience, propagated by the US in order to make excuses for US soldiers defecting during the Korean War (et al).

        • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean everywhere that isn’t China or Russia or one of their satellites/annexes yeah.

          Not sure where you got the billionaire thing, I’ve never defended them, in word or action. (Living in a capitalist country and needing a job for resources doesn’t make me a billionaire apologist)

          Liberalism and billionaire worship are not the same thing, same as communism and xi are not the same thing.

          To be clear: just because xi figuratively leads a communist country doesn’t mean this policy is perfectly communist.

          Same thing goes for billionaires existing in a liberal society.

          Lastly, the existence of either doesn’t invalidate the tenets of either ideology

          • The dogspaw
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Xi is no different than any other billionaire shit head most of the communist party top leaders use there position to gain control over the state controlled businesses

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              191 year ago

              This is incoherent. Xi has administrative control (or influence) over state enterprises, but he isn’t getting profits or stock options from them, so there are no grounds for calling him a billionaire

              communist party top leaders use there position to gain control over the state controlled businesses

              This is like saying you became a police commissioner to gain control over local police cars. Yeah, an explicit part of your job is that you can direct them, but the claim is so tautological that it looks like you are saying something else. It’s not like Xi will retain control of these enterprises after he leaves office.

            • captcha [any]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              151 year ago

              Xi first started geting so much hate from the west because he actually started purging communist party members for being too involved in the private sector. If he was encouraging the bourgeoisification of the CPC he would be hailed by the west.

        • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          This is a message board, where we reply to each other.

          By your approach: why did you feel the need to defend him? See? Silly.

        • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          This is a message board, where we reply to each other.

          By your approach: why did you feel the need to defend him? See? Silly.

            • The dogspaw
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              This is a massage board where we reply to each other see silly Billy 😜

                • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago
                  1. A handle does not imply gender, I’ve been around since early IRC and it’s never been true.

                  2. I referred to you as “y’all” when I replied directly. When I replied later I didn’t even look at your name again, or remember who you were. I replied to “shimmering koi”. Is that a fish person? Obviously not.

                  3. I fucking hate tankies but I have zero issue with any gender, pronoun, sexuality, race, ethnicity, etc. If I ever had to talk to you again, I’d be fine to refer to you as whatever you want. But I wouldn’t remember you because this is a anonymous social media platform and identify is meaningless.

                  4. I forgot to block you in the first place lol

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        I am pretty sure “classist” is seen as a valid insult even among radlibs, and many other people believe in equivalent terms (“elitist” is not too far off)