• CmdrShepard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You don’t see the difference between these two scenarios? It may benefit you to learn about nuance.

      • CmdrShepard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What you’re saying here doesn’t make any sense. What you said previously made sense but lacked nuance or any deeper understanding of the situation you proposed yourself.

        Perhaps you think blatant, ignorant bigotry and “testing freedom of speech” are the same thing, which explains your response, and shows you the reasoning behind mine.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh boy. No, I don’t think they are the “same thing” I’m saying you can’t infer motivation just by observing therefore the motivation isn’t relevant. Try and keep up, or don’t.

          • CmdrShepard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re discussing the law and being arrested. Intent absolutely matters in this context which is why I brought up other examples of where intent matters as murder/manslaughter, hate crimes, assault versus self defense, etc. You seem quite confused about a topic that you brought up on your own…

            • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re not thinking clearly. Intent is irrelevant, it can’t be known in this example. Got it?

              Just in case, here it is again. Intent is irrelevant.

              • CmdrShepard
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But you defined the intent in your previous comment and laws/courts take intent into account when determining whether they’ve been violated or not.

                If it can’t be known then your entire question/scenario is irrelevant and pointless because it could never apply to the real world. For someone who keeps talking about confusion and not following the conversation, you seem to lack even a basic understanding of what’s being talked about.