I found this article by Cato Institute, of all places, interesting as it criticizes the Republican rhetoric about the constitution as possibly…deeply misinformed.
I found this article by Cato Institute, of all places, interesting as it criticizes the Republican rhetoric about the constitution as possibly…deeply misinformed.
This feels like a weird, leading question. What part of my original response prompted you to ask it? Or did you just accidentally reply to the wrong person?
You brought up that candidates are antagonistic to parts of the constitution, clearly as a negative. So why is it a bad thing
Uh, no? I offered no opinions on that whatsoever. I simply summed up the article by saying:
In this sentence, I’m saying that the author of the article said that. For proof, you can read the article.