• @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    410 months ago

    That would require you to disclose proof of your real-life identity to some dubious company for the purpose of unlocking porn. Definitely not privacy-preserving.

    • @devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      The company you disclose your age and online reference to doesn’t need to know how their confirmation will be used. It could be an entity already knowledgeable (DVLA, IRS).

      But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.

      • @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.

        That is precisely the problem. It will mostly or only be used for porn.

        • Not really. Most social media involves some rudimentary age verification, even though their age threshold is lower. Same goes for banking and interacting with government sites. Far from the only ones.