If so, was it polled somewhere?

  • @bzz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The quote was to establish that the admins personal feelings are involved about the instance.

    It is an objective fact that the sub was banned on Reddit for hate speech. The rolling eyes emoji establishes the admins personal feelings on the subject.

    Whether the ban is justified or not is irrelevant to my point that SJW does not care to understand what its user base may want.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      objective fact

      It’s an “objective fact” that support for John Brown’s history of fighting slavery and slavers is hate speech?

      Way to drop that mask.

    • Whether or not the eye roll is justified is in question when the quote is supposed to emblematic of the admin’s opinions of the instance. Some of our staunchest detractors can admin that “kill slave owners” is not hate speech because “slave owner” is not a protected class. Do you think dismissal of this logic is so outlandish that it must be emblematic of support for our instance? Because I don’t see any other reason to include it.