• thilo
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Even if I would do that I suppose you wouldn’t be happier with the situation. And guess what, neither would I.

    • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      361 year ago

      But that’s what you’re saying, right? These deaths are valuable just for the sake of fighting in some abstract sense? Because the bad guy is bad?

      • thilo
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, as I said in my first answer, there are no generally right or wrong answers. There are people dying because of some vanity project of the rich and powerful. I also hold the opinion, that those shall be prevented at all costs. But if my information on the conflict is correct and this war started as a civil war on the topic of secession, then the question get’s hard to answer almost instantly, and also highly individual.

        • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          261 year ago

          How can you both say that the war is a vanity project for the rich and powerful and the same time argue that the deaths caused by it have meaning?

          • thilo
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because for some people they do.

            edit: In another post you mentioned the breakaway republics, there you have your examples. People who don’t want to live under a certain regime or don’t want to live under theirs anymore. Sometimes fighting is the only option left for people, and sometimes fighting people know they will die fighting.