• @Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Now I want to be invited to an evil science-lord convention.

      Bonus points if it is held in an underground volcanic lair.

    • @TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Have you seen any scientific publications posted to these comments that prove the pandimic didn’t result from a lab leak? I haven’t.

      • @notacat@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        What possible evidence would there be to “prove” this negative? Maybe if we happened to find the exact source animal to test? Since that is unlikely, all we have to go is the genome of the virus compared to similar viruses in the wild and similar viruses in published research. And that wouldn’t be proof enough for you.

        • @TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          You don’t need to prove or disprove a negative. You simply must allow for it to be a possibility unless evidence comes forth which proves that the doubts are unfounded. For instance, if patient zero was found and they had no contact with the lab, if a wild source of COVID-19 with the same genetic structure was found, or if it was proven than none of the samples in the lab could be the source of the infection.

          The problem here is that I opened up the possibility by asking the question, and hateful, partial, non-scientific minds decided to dogpile me for threatening their beliefs and faith in authority.

        • @TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          My own what? I am posting my own doubts about the story. Do I need evidence to distrust two governments with a history of experimenting on their populations?