@NightOwl@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoSeymour Hersh: A Year of Lying About Nord Streamwww.mintpressnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up161
arrow-up161external-linkSeymour Hersh: A Year of Lying About Nord Streamwww.mintpressnews.com@NightOwl@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-square@zephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilink11•1 year agoDidn’t German and Dutch companies fund Nordstream 2? “Russia’s pipeline” indeed.
minus-square@Madison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•edit-21 year agoDoesn’t really matter who paid for it so long as it’s intent is to send oil/gas one way and huge amounts of money the other way.
minus-square@Count042@lemmy.mllinkfedilink7•1 year agoIt does matter, as Germany is a NATO member, and the pipelines were critical infrastructure and blowing them up would be an act of war.
minus-square@zephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilink6•1 year agoIt’s infrastructure that Germany and the Netherlands funded. Why doesn’t it matter?
minus-square@Madison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoBecause it wasn’t blown up because of who funded it but rather who it benefits most. I’m not saying it’s right but it’s at least a save thought.
Didn’t German and Dutch companies fund Nordstream 2? “Russia’s pipeline” indeed.
Doesn’t really matter who paid for it so long as it’s intent is to send oil/gas one way and huge amounts of money the other way.
It does matter, as Germany is a NATO member, and the pipelines were critical infrastructure and blowing them up would be an act of war.
It’s infrastructure that Germany and the Netherlands funded. Why doesn’t it matter?
Because it wasn’t blown up because of who funded it but rather who it benefits most. I’m not saying it’s right but it’s at least a save thought.