cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/6018317

Hello World!

As we’ve all known and talked about quite a lot, we previously blocked several piracy-focused communities. These communities, as announced, were:

In our removal announcement, we stated that we will continue to look into this more in detail, and re-allow these communities if and when we deem it safe. It was a solid concern at the time, because we were already receiving takedown requests as well as constant attacks, and didn’t want to put our volunteer team at risk. We had zero measures in place, and the tools we had were insufficient to deal with anything at scale.

Well, after back and forth with some very cool people, and starting to have proper measures as well as tooling to protect ourselves, we decided it’s time to welcome these communities back again. Long live the IT nerds!

We know it’s been a rough ride with everything, and we’d like to thank every one of you who were understanding of us, and stayed with us all the way. Please know that as users, you are what makes this platform what it is, and damned we be if we ever forget it.

With love, and as always, stay safe in the high seas!

Lemmy.world Team

❤️

  • @hottari@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 months ago

    I used to have an account on that woke instance. Left the dumpster fire for lemmy.ml. Not going to entertain obvious censorship on Lemmy.

      • @hottari@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        Just a free-minded individual with strong views about freedom of speech & censorship.

        • UnruffledOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          129 months ago

          You are entitled to your views, but please don’t turn this post into a political discussion. If you want to talk about your political opinions, there are plenty of communities for that topic. !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com is not one of those communities. Thanks and have a good day.

            • UnruffledOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              119 months ago

              Yes, so people in our community are aware of the ‘unremoval’, not to hate on lemmy.world. It’s a move in the right direction and personally I’m glad they took this step. Everyone is so tribal nowadays, just chill.

        • raven [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No anti-“woke” voices are even remotely approaching getting “censored” or “silenced”. If they are then why do I have to hear about them every fucking day?

          On the contrary, if you want to hear from a good portion of the population about issues that affect them you need some aggressively anti-racist anti-sexist anti-queerphobic etc spaces or you won’t likely get the chance. Isn’t hearing what real marginalized people have to say about their own experiences a million times more important than some vague worry about crypto-fash#56637 getting to say their piece which has already been heard and generally decided to be socially harmful and, importantly, silencing to the people their racist, ___-phobic etc speech implies violence to? A chilling effect as you freeze-peach enthusiasts call it.

          Isn’t freedom of speech more about an individual having the right to hear from many viewpoints, than it is about an individual having the right to say anything and everything, anywhere, any time, they so desire?

    • @pup_atlas@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      169 months ago

      This doesn’t sound like censorship, it sounds like they were getting legal threats directly levied at their volunteer team. I can understand the desire to protect yourself against getting sued for your (admittedly large) side project. It sounds like they are working on it in good faith though.

      • @hottari@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        it sounds like they were getting legal threats directly levied at their volunteer team

        In the spirit of transparency to the community, post pictures of the legal letters received. Or am just going to assume you are carrying out moderation ahem censorship on the instance.

        sounds like they are working on it in good faith though.

        Sure. All censorship starts out in good faith.

        • @pup_atlas@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          Firstly, let me be clear. This is my opinion as someone who isn’t, and has never been involved with their instance in any capacity. My account is with pawb.social.

          Posting legal letters may open them up to additional legal liability, and it is completely reasonable to let the community know what happened without sharing the actual letter.

          Secondly, you’re putting words in my mouth. I am not saying they are censoring in good faith. I am saying the complete opposite, that they are reversing their stance in good faith. In other words, they are uncensoring content in good faith.

          • @hottari@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Posting legal letters may open them up to additional legal liability

            So it’s a case of their word against ours… Anyway, IANAL but I’ve seen other similarly positioned projects in the open-source software world post evidence of similar letters.

            they are uncensoring content in good faith

            You do understand that this means that at worst the legal threat did not exist in the first place. At best, the threat no longer exists. Either way, the damage is already done. I don’t see the point of walking back. You just don’t get to “uncensor” things after the fact.

    • @Gamey@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      What tf was woke about that or even better question what tf dose woke even mean by now?..

      • @hottari@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        Trigger happy on banning communities/speech under the guise of moderation using a loosely interpreted TOS policy counts as woke to me.

        • @Gamey@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          129 months ago

          That’s just shitty moderation and probably a overworked mod team, not sure what drug you got your hands on but I would kind of like to try it if you have any left!

          • @hottari@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            Sounds like excuses to me and avoidance in tackling the real issues at hand (censorship of content).

            • @Gamey@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              89 months ago

              There is a difference betwen cencorship and moderation and one of them is a must sve or you end up with 4chan 2.0 but in this case the decition was bad the the reasoning even worse!

              • @hottari@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                49 months ago

                I disagree. Lemmy mods that grew in size got trigger happy with the block button, just like reddit mods did/do. And uses the same tired excuses to justify their behavior.

                • @Gamey@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Lemmy mods have a horrible and unthankful job, they get flooded with CSAM we never have to see and I didn’t experience any issues with mods so far, is it possible that the issue is related to the kind of stuff you post?

                  • @hottari@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    39 months ago

                    What does mods getting CSAM posts have to do with banning a piracy community?

                    And I do not see the relevance in your second question.