• @Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    If US government decides to take over private stocks or tax them, US companies will exit US and American economy will die instantly. You can’t tax wealth, it’s impossible and doesn’t make any sense.

      • @Smk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        No you can’t tax wealth, it does not make any fucking sense. If I own a peice of land that, for some wild reason, is valued 1 billion, why the fuck would I pay taxes on 1 billion ??? especially if I just work at the starbuck for minimum wage. Like, it’s only gonna make the wealthy even wealthier. Only rich people are gonna be able to pay taxes on nice things.

        What do make sense is to pay taxes when I’m gonna sell that land 1 billion. That is sound. You pay tax on income, not on wealth. Maybe pay taxes on transactions.

        If you wanna tax the rich, start by reforming how capital gains are taxed.

        • @hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Funny that you should pick land, considering that property tax exists and is based on a valuation of your land. There’s a very simple solution if you can’t afford the tax on your wealth, which is to sell that wealth. If you can’t afford the tax then you can’t afford the wealth.

          • @Smk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Then take a company that is highly valued ? You understand the point and won’t engage with it. That is funny.

      • @Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        And as soon as that happens, those companies will start generating massive profits and paying their pittance (still in the billions btw) to other countries. It will also destroy the American job market and leave millions of people destitute.

        As much as it sucks, these billion (now trillion) dollar companies produce the lion’s share of America’s wealth. If they take their profits elsewhere, you can say ‘goodbye’ to the world order that the US is almost solely propping up.

        • @kugel7c@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          they take their profits elsewhere, you can say ‘goodbye’ to the world order that the US is almost solely propping up.

          I’m fairly sure in some way that’s what most of this sub should want explicitly, but while you imagine that necessarily as a slide backwards, I’m fairly convinced if the US ever gets to a wealth Tax their world order is already collapsing, and we are collectively transitioning to a better one. A world order based on actual global democratic decisions, instead of US Neo-imperialist domination perhaps.

          • @Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            You assume that most of these companies wouldn’t just move to a single destination that wouldn’t do the same shit that America did, which is to cater to rich people so that they can generate massive wealth for themselves and the governments of that nation. Unless the entire population of the world decides on a system that’s not like this one, it won’t happen; period. It’ll just shift elsewhere.

            And no matter how bad America is, I can imagine worse alternatives (hint: China)

              • @Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                …are you fucking serious right now? Do you really think that offshoring your manufacturing means ‘moving out of America’, or that it’s done to ‘avoid paying taxes’? Do you not understand that the vast majority of a company’s value isn’t created in the sweatshops where laborers are paid nickels and dimes, but in the boardrooms of megacorps where marketing departments put thousand-dollar labels on smartphones that cost a hundred dollars to make?

                  • @Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Wow, rock solid argument. ‘Yeah, idc if the US economy loses literal trillions if companies like MS and Apple move out! Who cares right?!’

                    Seriously, thanks for reminding me that, while things are already pretty fucking bleak, we’re still not living in the worst-case scenario.

            • @kugel7c@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Yes how about trying to imagine better alternatives instead of assuming everything impossible then.

              If the US led world order collapses that might be bad temporarily for US residents and it would be a great win for almost everyone else, almost by necessity. Again many winners few losers, much like the wealth tax. And not everyone needs to actually take up a better system, this is completely true in our current system already.

              • @Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                That’s such a narrow take. It won’t just be ‘bad temporarily for US citizens’ if the only country that’s a counter to China ceases to be a pre-eminent world player.

                • @kugel7c@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You know the world has other places than China and the US right. And that the us can still be a very powerful country without being the current hegemon. Certainly a welath tax wouldn’t achieve such impressive collapse in less than a few decades. The only real problem with a complete downfall of us hegemony might actually be the Taiwan situation.

                  But literally all of africa and south America would be in a much better situation if the US wouldn’t continue to have the power to protect some of its more historic foreign assets large parts of SEA and the middle east would also have much to celebrate.

                  You seem strangely scared of china while having little empathy towards anyone that might be suffering under US aligned rule. My take isn’t narrow but your view of the world might be. If you are at least from the US I might understand somewhat, if not then yikes.

          • @Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Please don’t tell me you actually believe any of that. How does a company like Apple, which essentially vacuums up consumer money around the globe, converts it into American profit, and then directly injects it into the American economy through high-value employment in software/marketing/sales etc to pump up the values of American stock exchanges through its stock valuation (stocks that, btw, make up the bulk of 401k’s of American citizens) not generate wealth for the US? Do you not know how this whole chain works?

            Also, these companies do pay billions in taxes annually. Sure, they use loopholes to not pay their fair share, but they do pay taxes that they otherwise wouldn’t need to pay if they weren’t operating within America.

    • @kugel7c@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Why do countries have wealth taxes and completely reasonable economies when it’s supposedly impossible. I’m not saying let me design a US wealth tax I’m saying wealth taxes do make sense, do exist and at least do something and the US could certainly implement them given sufficient political will.

      Two of the 5 OECD countries that have wealth taxes are neighboring countries to mine, they do have industry, services etc. certainly not dead places.

      Also I’ve never seen any (proposed) wealth tax start at anywhere lower than 1M in assets and with higher than 1% taxation so I just don’t see how any of the opposition is genuine. Why would there be such opposition to a topic that only impacts a few percent of the countries population. And that at the same time is actually properly understood by even fewer people.

      Also have you ever moved country with a several billion dollar company, with the US federal government after you for taxes, I don’t imagine it’d be particularly easy or cheap, the US has many massive subsidies for local companies, and some otherwise tax favorable conditions in some of it’s states, I doubt it would be an easy decision for many of these owners.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Countries were trying to tax wealth since Ancient Rome times and it NEVER worked. 12 OECD countries had some kind of wealth tax. As of 2021 only 5 have it. I bet you that in 20 years none will.

        The thing is that asset value is not money. It’s just a number someone got out of their ass. And this value is volatile, it can change in any direction any day. And you have pretty much zero control over it. Here’s an example from UK where I live. A lot of people bought homes to live in London in 1990-s for tens of thousands pounds. Today these houses are valued at over a million. You want to target those who have over 1M in assets? Well, most of London is now fucked for no reason and without any wrongdoing. How do you expect a nurse in retirement to pay such tax?

        OK, you put a limit higher to target Bezos. But Bezos doesn’t have cash to pay 1% from his billions. He will have to sell shares. That will tank Amazon share prices and potentially destroy the business. And who would want to buy shares and invest with taxes like that?

        By the way, the five countries are Colombia, France, Norway, Spain and Switzerland. France is already abandoning this stupid tax, Norway started to think about it. Economies of Colombia and Spain are in ruins partially thanks to this tax. And Switzerland… Well, Swiss are gonna Swiss. Their economy is very non-standard.

        • @kugel7c@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Yes I’ve read the Wikipedia article as well thank you very much but you still don’t seem to accept that taxes can and should be used to regulate the economy. That’s the entire point frankly. Some business should be destroyed because it’s bad for the people at large. Some people should need to get rid of one of their houses so that it doesn’t remain empty half the year. That’s the point.

          And even if Norway and France abandon this policy and Spain and Columbia are supposedly in ruin couldn’t their collective healt and happiness not be better even despite a smaller economy. Is it impossible for you to imagine a world where a smaller economy is better for it’s people than a larger one.

          And on the other side of the coin wouldn’t you think not being sovereign over the world reserve currency and the largest economy in the world make it a lot harder to protect yourself effectively from capital flight.