• @qfjp
    link
    English
    29 months ago

    Dude, don’t tell me what I know when you can’t get the terminology right, and can’t bother to remember the name.

    Oh wow! You also know how to use mathematica! To reproduce the graph on Wikipedia! I guess that means you know statistamics or whatever the name is.

    Now extend your graph to people making below minimum wage. Can.you tell me where all.the tax money is going to come from? It uses calculus though, so hopefully you can be bothered to remember how integrals work (or as you probably call them, integracalc distribution functions)

    • @Decompose@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      You’re such an idiot you didn’t even understand what I did. I did a non-linear fit of the inverse law, not just a plot. But you’re ignorant so you can’t understand what that even means. Fuck off and read a book.

      Calculus? Dude I have a PhD in physics. Calculus is children’s play. But anyway, I think it’s time to block you.

      • @qfjp
        link
        English
        29 months ago

        A non linear fit! Holy shit! Thats the same graph they have on Wikipedia! While I don’t believe you have a degree past high school, your arrogance does match the physicists in grad school. Probably also explains why you think using Mathematica is impressive.