if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because…

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
  • Agentseed
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    Man, I’d love if markdown was more widely used, it’s pretty much the perfect format for everything I do

    • raubarno
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Markdown, CommonMark, .rst formats are good for printing basic rich text for technical documentation and so on, when text styling is made by an external application and you don’t care about reproducible layout.

      But you also want to make custom styles (font size, text alignment, colours), page layout (paper format, margin size, etc.) and make sure your document is reproducible across multiple processing applications, that the layout doesn’t break, authoring tools, maybe even some version control, etc. This is when it strikes you bad.

    • @PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Markdown misses checkboxes anywhere, especially in tables.

      But markdown is just good. It’s just writing text as normal basically

    • @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      You can convert Markdown to a number of formats with pandoc, if you want to author in Markdown and just distribute in some other format.

      Not going to work if you need to collaborate with other people, though.