• Maoo [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    Well yeah we should ideally abolish cars for all but the most necessary uses - rural living, etc. But that is something I think falls squarely in the “what we can do after overthrowing capitalism” vision bucket. Folks can grasp that even things more realizable under capitalism are simple and can be fought for. Those fights will also usually fail but in doing so can teach valuable lessons about the nature of bourgeois electoralism.

    • ped_xing [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      Car-free Manhattan is just the 78% of households without cars winning out over the 22% with and the daily invaders from out of town. Those percentages are way beyond pro-weed vs. anti-weed and weed has won in a lot of places even without overthrowing capitalism. It’s long overdue there and even the late mayor Koch considered it before I was born.

      • Maoo [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        It will lose because 78% isn’t organized and willing to force change down the throats of those with power.

        By the time they were, we could do the necessary overthrow of capitalism first because it is the capitalists that will prevent a car-free Manhattan.

        But I’m also saying that you can try. When you do, remember who the enemy is and see who prevents you - and who they align with!