The sub went missing while carrying five people to the wreckage of the Titanic.

  • HeartyBeast
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    OK. Explain why they would have more trouble working at that depth.

      • SporkBomber
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        That’s dealing with communication through the water. Presumably the controller wouldn’t have water between it and its receiver under ideal conditions.

        • PabloDiscobar
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Show it. “Presumably” won’t cut it.

          For the records, so far the only one with a source is me.

      • iThinkergoiMac
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Your link is for wireless transmissions going through water. In this case, it’s still going through air.

        It’s not the altitude or depth that matters, it’s the medium through which the signal goes. It will work just fine, from a technical standpoint.

        That being said, wireless things are inherently unreliable compared to wired, and it’s stupid to make something so important not as reliable as possible.

        • PabloDiscobar
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          It’s not the altitude or depth that matters, it’s the medium through which the signal goes. It will work just fine, from a technical standpoint.

          I know that. What makes you think that the other part was not in the water? Do you have any source for that?

            • PabloDiscobar
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              aka “the easy way out”.

              You take for granted that the wireless was for inside equipment, I don’t. I asked if someone has a source about the design but no one brought anything. That’s where we are.

              You don’t need no attitude here, if you know something then write it and mention the source.

      • HeartyBeast
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Well - how about out if the receiver is on the the hull - and the bluetooth signals don’t have to travel through any water?

        • PabloDiscobar
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Maybe. And? Don’t overthink it, I’m answering to someone who boldly claimed:

          “OK. Explain why they would have more trouble working at that depth”

          and who is long gone btw.

            • PabloDiscobar
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Well, I gave you a reason why it would cause problem, if the device piloted was out, in the water.

              Do you have a schematic of the sub? I don’t.

              • HeartyBeast
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Do you have a schematic of the sub? I don’t.

                You were the one who called the decision to use Bluetooth “Delusional”. I’m the one who said we have no idea whether it was a good idea or not - so I think we can leave it here.