@bot@lemmy.smeargle.fansMB to Hacker News@lemmy.smeargle.fans • 9 months agoUSB-C teardown with CT scans: Thunderbolt and morewww.lumafield.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up144file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlapple@lemdro.idandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up144external-linkUSB-C teardown with CT scans: Thunderbolt and morewww.lumafield.com@bot@lemmy.smeargle.fansMB to Hacker News@lemmy.smeargle.fans • 9 months agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlapple@lemdro.idandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-square@Jumpinship@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•edit-29 months agoYou can get same quality thunderbolt cables that are constructed 100% the same way for under 25 bucks
minus-square@Mr_Blott@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•9 months agoClent clearly paid $129 for a cable and isn’t happy at me 😂
minus-square@Clent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•9 months agoI have no need for that cable, but unlike you I’m not ignorant in realizing some do and why they do.
minus-square@KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink3•9 months ago100% the same way? Doubt it. Of similar (or better) quality and function? Absolutely.
You can get same quality thunderbolt cables that are constructed 100% the same way for under 25 bucks
Clent clearly paid $129 for a cable and isn’t happy at me 😂
I have no need for that cable, but unlike you I’m not ignorant in realizing some do and why they do.
100% the same way? Doubt it. Of similar (or better) quality and function? Absolutely.
You didn’t read the article either.