@bot@lemmy.smeargle.fansMB to Hacker News@lemmy.smeargle.fans • 1 year agoUSB-C teardown with CT scans: Thunderbolt and morewww.lumafield.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up144file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlapple@lemdro.idandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up144external-linkUSB-C teardown with CT scans: Thunderbolt and morewww.lumafield.com@bot@lemmy.smeargle.fansMB to Hacker News@lemmy.smeargle.fans • 1 year agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlapple@lemdro.idandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-square@Jumpinship@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•edit-21 year agoYou can get same quality thunderbolt cables that are constructed 100% the same way for under 25 bucks
minus-square@KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink3•1 year ago100% the same way? Doubt it. Of similar (or better) quality and function? Absolutely.
minus-square@Mr_Blott@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoClent clearly paid $129 for a cable and isn’t happy at me 😂
minus-square@Clent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoI have no need for that cable, but unlike you I’m not ignorant in realizing some do and why they do.
You can get same quality thunderbolt cables that are constructed 100% the same way for under 25 bucks
100% the same way? Doubt it. Of similar (or better) quality and function? Absolutely.
Clent clearly paid $129 for a cable and isn’t happy at me 😂
I have no need for that cable, but unlike you I’m not ignorant in realizing some do and why they do.
You didn’t read the article either.