• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Communists accept that violence is often a valid and necessary form of resistance. For example, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the way Bolsheviks used violence. However, what you said above is just pure nonsense rooted in your superficial understanding of the subject.

    • @crackajack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Tell that to practical realities lived under the Marxist-Leninist authorities.

      The way I see it, ideology is like religion. More often than not, theory and practice do not align. It is especially the case with communism. And look, I will be blunt, you’re committing “No true Scotsman” fallacy. You’re right in theory, but again, the practical reality says otherwise. You claim there are no true communists or Marxist-Leninists who would advocate for wanton violence, but the reality is that there plenty of examples. The Bolsheviks arrested farmers who are apparently too rich. But it is an excuse for collectivisation of farms under state control. Marx also did not believe in the existence of state (he thought it should be a transitional entity towards collective ownership of production under classless structure). And yet, no state who profess to be communists, or its variation, ever relinquished power.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Having grown up in USSR, I think I understand the practical realities of Marxist-Leninist authority a hell of a lot better than you. I implore you to spend he time actually learn about the subject you’re attempting to debate here because all you’re doing is just making straw man arguments out of ignorance. You also evidently have no understanding of what Marx actually said.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Sounds like you are surprised when confronted with what somebody who actually lived in a communist country tells you about it. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that you think you know more about communism than people who actually experienced it though. That’s very American of you.

            • @crackajack@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Very arrogant and presumptuous of you think I’m an American.

              If you are what you claim you are, what can you say about gulags and the purges in the Soviet Union?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                link
                fedilink
                51 year ago

                US has a higher prison population today than USSR did even under Stalin. So, if gulags are bad, then clearly what we see under capitalism is even worse. Meanwhile, not sure what specifically you need to be told about the purges. All revolutions are messy, and require purging the regressive elements.

                What’s really telling is that people like you always have to reach back to the days right after the revolution to find something to complain about ignoring all the decades of how USSR developed after. You’ve just memorized a handful of tropes and you regurgitate them thinking that you’re making some intelligible points here.

                • @crackajack@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  The purges happened years after the Bolsheviks gained power. The gulags continued until the fall of the Soviet Union.

                  So, what would you say about hundreds and thousands of people arrested for simply making a joke, owning a farm, being captured soldiers who escaped from German captivity, making mistakes on a job, the music apparently isn’t working class enough. What do you make of these accounts?