@erik111189@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world • 1 year agoWhat are some companies that deserve to be boycotted to death?message-square349fedilinkarrow-up1380file-text
arrow-up1380message-squareWhat are some companies that deserve to be boycotted to death?@erik111189@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square349fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNeuromancerlinkfedilink4•1 year agoThey don’t. That’s the difference. NASA wants every launch to be a success. Space x is willing to blow some shit up to test an idea. I prefer the nasa method for rockets. Too much risk just blowing shit up in my opinion.
minus-squarepensalinkfedilink1•1 year agoI disagree. I think NASA still innovates but they do it on things like propulsion and earth sciences.
minus-squareNeuromancerlinkfedilink2•1 year agoThey are slow but it is by design. They want things to be safe. Some say they over engineer things but I think when we are talking about people, that is needed.
minus-square@intensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•1 year agoWhen we’re talking about people dying, SpaceX has a better record than NASA
minus-square@Balex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 year agoSpaceX created the first successful Full Flow Stage Combustion Cycle Engine, so they’re also innovative in the propulsion department.
They don’t.
That’s the difference. NASA wants every launch to be a success.
Space x is willing to blow some shit up to test an idea.
I prefer the nasa method for rockets. Too much risk just blowing shit up in my opinion.
I disagree. I think NASA still innovates but they do it on things like propulsion and earth sciences.
They are slow but it is by design. They want things to be safe. Some say they over engineer things but I think when we are talking about people, that is needed.
When we’re talking about people dying, SpaceX has a better record than NASA
SpaceX created the first successful Full Flow Stage Combustion Cycle Engine, so they’re also innovative in the propulsion department.