• Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      348 months ago

      Also a not-insignificant amount of Asia, Africa, and Pacific islands.

    • @Furball@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      108 months ago

      South America just isn’t really too involved in international politics in general, the whole region is neutral in almost all conflicts since very few directly affect them

            • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              28 months ago

              If you use the old Cold War definition, yes. Otherwise

              However, as the Cold War ended with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the definition largely shifted to instead refer to any country that boasts a well-functioning democratic system with little prospects of political risk, in addition to a strong rule of law, a capitalist economy with economic stability, and a high standard of living.

    • @orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      I said this about Assad as well, but when someone is a forever ruler, it may not be as democratic as the name implies

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Of course. I am not going to defend the particular choice of countries in that picture. Where is South Korea, for example? However. Democracy is greater than just democratic election. Fascists in Germany also come to power in a free democratic election, does not make Nazi Germany a democratic country.

      • @KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        The nazis in Germany came to power in the “Machtergreifung” (seizure of power).
        In the last free democratic election, they got 33% of the vote.

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Yes, but it was by far the largest (the second party got just 20%) and in multiparty system that was enough to later enact laws that made it into dictatorship.