@AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoRed Hat strikes a crushing blow against RHEL downstreamswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up176file-textcross-posted to: privacyguideswolnyinternet@szmer.infotechnology@beehaw.orglibre_culture@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up176external-linkRed Hat strikes a crushing blow against RHEL downstreamswww.theregister.com@AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacyguideswolnyinternet@szmer.infotechnology@beehaw.orglibre_culture@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
https://web.archive.org/web/20230624163406/https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/23/red_hat_centos_move/
minus-squareV linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoYou make a good point. I imagine RedHat is doing this less because of Rocky/Alma, and more so because of Oracle.
minus-square@Laser@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoOracle might be another one, though I guess that as weird as that sounds, at least they add value by providing their “unbreakable enterprise kernel”. I guess Oracle will be hit the least as they do have the manpower to make sure their distribution stays RHEL compatible, but at a higher cost.
You make a good point. I imagine RedHat is doing this less because of Rocky/Alma, and more so because of Oracle.
Oracle might be another one, though I guess that as weird as that sounds, at least they add value by providing their “unbreakable enterprise kernel”.
I guess Oracle will be hit the least as they do have the manpower to make sure their distribution stays RHEL compatible, but at a higher cost.