@SoccerGod@fanaticus.social to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 months agoI hate chromiumfanaticus.socialimagemessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up11.31K
arrow-up11.31KimageI hate chromiumfanaticus.social@SoccerGod@fanaticus.social to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 months agomessage-square148fedilink
minus-square@Supervisor194@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink13•7 months agoNo, dynamic content should absolutely be able to be delivered through the open Web, not just through walled gardens. Apps are almost universally shit.
minus-square@smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink2•7 months agoNo problem with sending some JavaScript module extending browser’s capability. But the problem I see is sending whole sites this way, sometimes even rendering HTML on the visitor’s browser, yack…
No, dynamic content should absolutely be able to be delivered through the open Web, not just through walled gardens. Apps are almost universally shit.
No problem with sending some JavaScript module extending browser’s capability. But the problem I see is sending whole sites this way, sometimes even rendering HTML on the visitor’s browser, yack…