Whatever man, I’ll enjoy my functionally identical display while you’re fucking around with returns and wondering why there’s so much ewaste on this planet.
I’d love to have your superhuman eyesight that can detect a dead pixel on a 4K TV from 10 feet away.
The conversation is actually about manufacturer greed (w.r.t sale prices going past $1000) and audacity to ask customers to pay that much for a less than perfect (their marketing material, theur words) device.
I hate greedy corporations as much as the next guy, but manufacturers are not going to up their QC to include single dead pixels and take a hit to their profit margin. They’d increase prices, by a lot.
Maybe there’s a market for displays that meet this standard for the nitpickers, and sell the ones that fail at a discount, but they’d definitely be a premium.
It’s funny how everyone pretends to give a fuck about environmentalism until they’re faced with the most minor of minor inconveniences.
deleted by creator
Whatever man, I’ll enjoy my functionally identical display while you’re fucking around with returns and wondering why there’s so much ewaste on this planet.
I’d love to have your superhuman eyesight that can detect a dead pixel on a 4K TV from 10 feet away.
deleted by creator
Grow up
deleted by creator
lol
I like how you’re trying to tie manufacturers selling defective items at full price to environmentalism as if that makes the practice okay.
The conversation is actually about manufacturer greed (w.r.t sale prices going past $1000) and audacity to ask customers to pay that much for a less than perfect (their marketing material, theur words) device.
I hate greedy corporations as much as the next guy, but manufacturers are not going to up their QC to include single dead pixels and take a hit to their profit margin. They’d increase prices, by a lot.
Maybe there’s a market for displays that meet this standard for the nitpickers, and sell the ones that fail at a discount, but they’d definitely be a premium.