Florida Joker is in the news again, this time demanding to speak with Rockstar Games, or to be given $1-2 million over his likeness in GTA 6.

  • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The title says: Grand Theft Horse. The description says:

    “DISCLAIMER: Any elements of the game “Rustler” that are inspired by elements of the pop culture are to be seen a parody or caricature.”

    Why does it have to be a parody only of games? Parody in general is protected, as the games show.

    Saints Row is a parody, as confirmed: https://screenrant.com/best-parody-video-games/

    • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Why does it have to be a parody only of games? Parody in general is protected, as the games show.

      Uhh… because that’s what we were talking about here….?

      Where does it say it’s a parody of GTA…?

      And that proves nothing but another person has your opinion, the only way to prove it would be a source from the developer, but that won’t exist since if they say it, they would be cease and desisted.

      • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        It was a parody of GTA when it was announced and shown, as everyone said when we saw it.

        We were talking about parody, but okay. They were all games parodying people and other things but apparently isn’t good enough for you.

        • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          No it was never announced as a parody of gta or they would have been cease and desisted.

          Just because a game is in the same genre doesn’t suddenly make it a parody.

          You responded to my comment about specific game parodies, I’m sorry you can’t converse properly.

          • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            That’s apt since you said this:

            Can you provide a single one?

            And now I see you’re the same person who deliberately ignores what a rule says explicitly. Well done.

            I gave you plenty of clear parodies or other things too, one which has the name + Horse in the title but that’s not good enough for you either. Okay.