Will this undermine most of what makes IAmA special? Probably. But Reddit leadership has all the funds they need to hire people to perform those extra tasks we formerly undertook as volunteer moderators, and we’d be happy to collaborate with them if they choose to do so.

  • ijeff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Definitely. Somewhere along the way, it was also missed that downvotes were intended to be for content that were off-topic or not constructive to the conversation rather than something one merely disagreed with. I’ve found much of my moderating had become about reminding people to keep it civil.

    • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Yes absolutely, it’s bad rediquette to downvote just because you disagree, if it contributes to the debate.

      I wonder how many even know that on reddit today? I bet most think they are just “like” buttons.

      • XiELEd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As someone who joined Reddit when it became mainstream, I didn’t know that something like “Reddiquette” existed, and that it had changed drastically in its history. I thought it just boiled down to social norms like “NO EMOJIS ALLOWED”, don’t ask obvious questions (which can be subjective), or answer a question that was meant to be rhetorical.

          • XiELEd
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Oh shit, it is. I don’t think I’ve ever read that, and most people probably haven’t too, if I looked at the comment section on any post on r/all I would see the reddiquette broken many times (I am personally guilty with non-transparent editing). Most of the behaviour I found annoying on Reddit were breaking the Reddiquette rules lol.

            • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              It’s probably pretty hard to imagine the actual difference in quality of debate when you haven’t seen it.

              But I’m guessing it’s easy to imagine that there would be a difference.