• @zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    3710 months ago

    To say they have nothing going for them and are being propped up by the government is not at all accurate

    That isn’t what they’re saying though, is it? They’re saying that SpaceX has the ability to fail more than NASA, because they’re not a government organization funded solely by taxes.

    • @jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1610 months ago

      Admittedly I think the biggest failures that hurt NASA were incidents when people, not rockets, blew up. It’ll be interesting to see if things change if/when there is a death from a SpaceX rocket.

      • @jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        People die in work related incidents all the time. The only thing different about deaths from NASA incidents is that they are (usually) spectacular incidents (like massive explosions or cabin fires…not good things, just stunning) and high-profile.

        SpaceX does well because they basically ignore Elon.

    • @Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      That’s definitely true. That should still not take away from the accomplishments of the SpaceX engineers. ULA had the same exact opportunities but completely wasted them.

      • @zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Oh sorry yeah that was poorly worded. I don’t mean to say that SpaceX engineers are failures, what they’ve accomplished is nothing short of incredible. But failure is an inevitable part of the engineering process of iterating and improving your solution. NASA doesn’t have the luxury of quick iteration cycles like SpaceX does (comparatively), because each iteration means more money out of the taxpayers’ pockets.