@LMAO is flooding the site with random communities because they’re salty about being banned for claiming too many community names. They claim they’re trying to “fuck your entire site up” but I imagine it’s a relatively quick fix to delete all the communities they’re creating, LMAO.

    • @PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      Counterpoint: we don’t need growth if the cost is the destruction of a good thing. Guided growth is smarter and more sustainable especially when users like the subject of this post aren’t unique. There are a lot of small, mean-spirited people out there who will take a dump all over everything the moment they can.

    • Ataraxia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Growth for the sake of growth is why reddit and everything else crashes and burns.

      • EuphoricPenguin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Eeh, federated platforms add a lot more moving parts to the mix. Since there isn’t a single Lemmy that is all of Lemmy, people can always move to another instance if this one goes to shit.

      • @MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        There are always going to be assholes who abuse the system, always. I agree with the other poster that now is a good time to get communities up and running. People like LMAO have nothing but time to be internet douchebags and find ways around the system.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      True, but they could limit community creation to, say, five a day. That would be more than the vast majority of people would legitimately need.

      • @XiELEd@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately that would mean that real communities wouldn’t be created since that would be used up by someone creating spam communities. Though, maybe limiting the amount of communities that could be made by one account in a certain amount of time? What about verification by email (to send a coherent reason) to the admins to create a community.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          I was meaning five per day for a given user. That’s why I said that would be plenty for most individuals - most people aren’t legitimately going to want to create more than five communities in a day, and for them it wouldn’t be a hardship to wait a day for another five. But for people like this guy, trying to flood the instance with endless/pointless communities, it would cut that down to a manageable number.

          • @XiELEd@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Oh 😅 I’m sorry for misunderstanding. 5 communities per day in a week is 35 communities, which I also thought was a lot. Where do we send our suggestions to the admins though?