@MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • edit-25 months agoWhat could go wrong trying to solve AoC in Rust?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up173file-text
arrow-up173imageWhat could go wrong trying to solve AoC in Rust?sh.itjust.works@MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • edit-25 months agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@crispy_kilt@feddit.delinkfedilink3•5 months agoHow would you have preferred to solve it? Using for loops?
minus-square@AVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-25 months agoPython style iterator comprehension (wonder if someone has made that into a macro. if no one has I will)
minus-square@crispy_kilt@feddit.delinkfedilink1•5 months agoI don’t think it would be readable. Too much going on. You’d need an outer iter over lines, an inner over words, a check for number and a conversion. And there would be zero error handling.
minus-square@AVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish2•5 months agoNo less readable than half the Python comprehensions I’ve written. zero error handling. Not necessarily. The macro could look for a ? at the end of the final expression (the bit that comes first in a comprehension) and return a Result.
minus-square@crispy_kilt@feddit.delinkfedilink2•5 months agoRight, of course, I meant no error handling in the Python impl
How would you have preferred to solve it? Using for loops?
Python style iterator comprehension
(wonder if someone has made that into a macro. if no one has I will)
I don’t think it would be readable. Too much going on. You’d need an outer iter over lines, an inner over words, a check for number and a conversion. And there would be zero error handling.
No less readable than half the Python comprehensions I’ve written.
Not necessarily. The macro could look for a ? at the end of the final expression (the bit that comes first in a comprehension) and return a Result.
Right, of course, I meant no error handling in the Python impl