• @brisk@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    185 months ago

    A percentage of income still isn’t equitable though.

    If you’re destitute a week’s income means you starve.

    If you’re a millionnaire a week’s income stings bit doesn’t affect much.

    If you’re a billionnaire there is a good chance you don’t technically have an income, and if you do you can lose half of your wealth without feeling it.

    • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      This is true, but you could still have a progressive fine. Very good point with the billionaire, though. They live in a completely different world, in terms of how their wealth flow works. Still, it seems like an alternative fine system could be worked out that would hit them hard.

      • @Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        The real solution is to remove the classes so high above everyone that the rules don’t apply. This is a difficult problem only because we’re talking about people who are so ludicrously wealthy a fine for literal hundreds of millions of dollars wouldn’t make them homeless.

        • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I agree. John Oliver once referred to billionaires as something like a bug in the structure of the system, and I wholeheartedly agree with that analysis. Unfortunately, they’re a bug that’s not so easily dislodged. Until then, designing systems that are able to deal with their existence is the best way to deal with them.

    • @Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      35 months ago

      The billionaire might not feel it, but the money gained could be significant for all sorts of good things that help lift the burdon of the lower class.