• @Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    Can’t say I agree with that take, I thought it was one of the better Indiana Jones movies, maybe even better than Temple Of Doom. It ticked all the boxes for me.

    • skribe
      link
      181 year ago

      Maybe even better than Temple of Doom

      They should put that on the posters.

      Damned with faint praise, indeed.

      • @orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I enjoyed Temple of Doom, more as a kid but for a general adventure story it work for me. I’ve also been watching Red Letter Media’s review of it recently so that may have skewed it higher. I always liked the idea of the old stories where someone could have an out of order adventure. For those that may not know we’d call it a prequel these days but it was modeled off of old stories that were just told for the same characters. Oddly whenever I try and create a cultist type story (Lovecraft and pulp) in my head it turns out very similar to Temple of Doom, so that probably impacts my opinion of it.

    • @DocWurzel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      Same here, I enjoyed the film. It portrayed Jones well as an aging person who is past their prime giving it one last shot. The action was good, the plot was enjoyable, the Nazis got a kicking. What’s not to like?

      • Rimorso
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        Basically all the chase scenes were camera glued 10 cm from the protagonists and shaky cam for 15 minutes at a time.

        • @ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Oh noooooo! I was just rewatching Raiders the other day and thinking about how good the camera work was, and how if they shot it today half of those fight scenes would be incomprehensible shaky cam. Sad to hear that Dial has fallen to the shaky side.