Is there a friendly alternative to VMWare/Virtualbox? I would move back to Virtualbox, but it’s now owned by oracle

  • @hddsx@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    19 months ago

    On a scale of Ubuntu install to LFS, how would you rate qemu’s difficulty to install?

    • flatbield
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      It is easy in itself. Like on Debian, just go into synaptic and install or use apg-get. Also if you can find a good how to to just follow.

      The thing about QEMU is that it has a blithering number of options and reading the man page to get an idea is a major time sink. The other challenge is deciding how you run it and interface with it via the GUI, and file system. You can setup but there are various choices. Also it integrates with other useful commands too – the commands to qcow manage images is a separate command. Or you can work with direct images and use dd, loopback, mount, etc to work with them. The nice thing is you get great Linux integration. The bad thing (or maybe good thing?) is helps to be good with man pages, bash scripting, command line, processes, networking, routing, and the Linux system.

      So do not think of it like an OS setup though you will probably do an OS setup in a VM, but qemu just a complicated command. In the end you’ll want to setup a folder tree, and some scripts to handle various things so it’s baked in. I use it that way, for flexibility but VirtualBox is much easier since there are menus for or that.

    • @linkbattosai
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m on Arch so it was actually in the repositories so it was easy to install. Qemu is command line only but you can download several front ends for it. I personally use virt-manager which was also in the Arch repositories. So depending on which distribution you use, it might be pretty easy to get it going on your end.