A federal judge yesterday ordered the Biden administration to halt a wide range of communications with social media companies, siding with Missouri and Louisiana in a lawsuit that alleges Biden and his administration violated the First Amendment by colluding with social networks “to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content.”

    • effingjoe
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      That was the data we had at the time, yes. New data can mean new stances, and that’s okay. But notice the order of operations there; new data, then new stance. Not the other way around.

      • C4RP3_N0CT3M
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They had data showing otherwise. They were silenced. I’ll keep bringing this up, but the director of the CDC at the time said there was significant evidence to investigate the lab leak theory, but was forcibly sidelined. They seem to have gotten your model backwards. This wasn’t the only time it happened, but people will keep crying “sources” since they know it’s now difficult to find information that was removed from journal sites, etc.

            • effingjoe
              link
              fedilink
              6
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You didn’t read that article, did you? It doesn’t support your stance.

              • C4RP3_N0CT3M
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The CDC director wasn’t forcibly sidelined because he suggested that COVID-19 could have come from a lab?

                  • C4RP3_N0CT3M
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    You’ve got to be kidding:

                    "Dr Redfield, who led the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention when the outbreak began in 2020, was an early proponent of the lab leak theory.

                    He told the House select subcommittee, formed by the new Republican majority in the US House of Representatives, it was “not scientifically plausible” to him that the virus had natural origins.

                    He claimed he was “sidelined” at the beginning of the pandemic and excluded from meetings as his views were not in line with other major scientists like Dr Fauci, the de-facto face of the US pandemic response."