He is an evil individual who fails to address systemic issues or assist people for their own benefit.

As a game show host, he humiliates and exploits participants, boasting about his own virtues without any regard for the contestants.

Examples:

I believe legal intervention is necessary to limit his actions towards people and prevent him from exploiting them for personal gain.

Quick note: while I believe that results of some of his videos is good ( which he did to show how good of a person he is), that does not change the facts about his evil videos, the same way bezoz donations does not make him a good person.

  • GreenPlasticSushiGrass
    2•4 months ago

    I watched the whole 34 minutes. Doesn’t this whole argument get lost in relativism? At what point am I giving enough? When I give up my health insurance? When I move into group home?

    • metaStatic
      1•4 months ago

      If you did watch the whole thing you already know the answer.

      but everything suffers from relativism. is health insurance a luxury if not having it could lead to you being unable to give to charity, Hell in places like America it could lead to you needing charity. And why move into a group home when you could move into your car?