Not discrediting Open Source Software, but nothing is 100% safe.

    • @TheYang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, what’s a “proper audit”?
      most audits my company does are a complete smoke and mirrors sham. But they do get certifications. Is that “proper”?

      I’m pretty confident that the code-quality of linux is, on average, higher than that of the windows kernel. And that is because not only do other people read and review, the programmer also knows his shit is for everyone to see. So by and large they are more ashamed to submit some stringy mess that barely works

      • @lemminer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I just had a thought, and thought of sharing it. I prefer to be skeptical and until properly convinced, why should I blindly believe in something?

        That said, I personally use Linux and BSD kernels, and I’m quite thankful for FOSS movement to exist in our reality.

    • Lvxferre
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I have doubt about the Linux kernel being properly audited.

      Torvalds is doing it so he has more reasons to chain insults. “I SAID NO REGRESSIONS, YOU BUNCH OF %#$%%&#$@#$%#&%#!!!”

    • @stappern
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Hubi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure the code submitted by the NSA has had more people look over it than any other snippet in there.

        • @lemminer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Probably there’s more to it. Who know maybe the active developers were contacted by secret services to add something kinky.