• fknM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    If this is the point you are making, you are doing a mediocre job of it while simultaneously making people angry. Neither of which is making your point apparent or relevant to the discussion.

    Epistemology is interesting, and many people would benefit from learning more about the subject and how to apply it to their own understanding of the world. The street epistemology series on YouTube (or wherever it is hosted now) has some interesting reactions of the average young adults reaction to experiencing it first hand.

    Biases are interesting, and most people would benefit from an exploration of their own biases.

    But… Devolving threads because someone is mixing colloquial usages of words and scientific terms, even in a thread about science, is asinine. Until the misuse of the words creates an actual tangible mistake in the discussion, it makes discussion and communication incredibly slow.

    • @fisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      No, this is just the end to a side discussion about objectivity - my main critique is that disagreement among adherents to a given religion should not be a reason to dismiss them.

      But I’ll admit I’m having more fun than I am trying to really educate, and agree with your assessment that I am doing a mediocre job at best.

      As for making people angry (or, more likely, annoyed) - apologies! My aim is to challenge, not annoy. Mostly.