Just logged into reddit, from Canada, it’s not working correctly. I suspect so many subs going dark have unveiled a bug that has broken some algorithms. Here’s hoping they are a pain to fix and require a significant reengineering effort. Anyone confirm the same behavior?

    • @MonkCanatella@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      391 year ago

      Like the antiwork fiasco. I remember the astroturfing going on where they tried to move people over to “work reform” aka we like work and bosses are good!

      • @Rick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        30
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no anti work believe no one should work and every should get paid for sitting on their asses, and work reform believes in giving workers what they want, such as higher pay, less hours, better benefits and things such as that.

        EDIT: based on my ratio im not sure I want to continue on this site lmao, I have a feeling its just going to turn into another Voat if this shit keeps up

          • @hydra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            191 year ago

            at least you get to see controversial entries get both upvotes and downvotes rather than the net number only. helps for better discussion.

          • @Rick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            Also with how federation works, I don’t have too see any of this if I dont want to so if Lemmy.World devolves into a communist instance I can just switch to a different one. Win for the both of us.

          • @Rick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            nah not wining as downvotes are completely irrelevant on lemmy, just thought it was interesting

        • @AnonTwo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          undefined> EDIT: based on my ratio im not sure I want to continue on this site lmao, I have a feeling its just going to turn into another Voat if this shit keeps up

          …Or the people on r/antiwork are here as well and downvoted you for a very bias post to their members?

          Like what did you think would happen? This would happen on Reddit as well unless you were on a subreddit that specifically supported your stance.

          • @t_renne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 year ago

            There is nothing biased about that post. The initial group of r/antiwork was against working at all. With more people joining that shifted to the more reasonable “work needs a major, worldwide reform because being treated like shit for fifty decades to then not have enough pension to survive is fucked up”

            Work Reform was then created because of “that” interview, it had nothing to do with cozying up to companies or bosses.

          • @Rick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            I agree work reform was slipping but it was not even close to the communist mess that is AntiWork. I’ve seen posts on AntiWork with hundreds of upvotes about burning down walmarts to send a message.

            • @perkele@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              It’s funny they chose that tactic to promote, seeing as walmart corporate will do all but burn the building down whenever there’s a successful union drive or anything that looks like it could manifest one. They’ll close the store indefinitely for ‘cleaning’, toss any spoiled inventory, and hire an all new crew. So not quite burning it down, but they’ll definitely footgun themselves to prevent any worker choice. Burning it down would do all the work for them.

          • @Banzai51@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            The anti-work sub did a “clear out” of people that just didn’t want to work, and now is more in line with work-reform. The original mod did some sort of interview that pissed off the users.

    • @BlankSix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      If it is deliberate, I’m pretty sure that’d be a call-our-bluff sort of situation and they’d end up with a longer blackout as a result, at least until the majority of participating mods are replaced/banned.

      I’d assumed a minor reverse-reddit-hug, personally - there are a lot of news stories on this today with a lot of links to reddit. Either way, a day in and I’m here and kinda loving it, despite it being a bit … wonky on posting today with all us refugees.

      • 🌍 kommanditbolag
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        It’s like… 28,000 mods. I don’t know how they’re gonna replace them. Of course they won’t have to replace all of them, but there’s still quite a sizeable lot.

          • @BlankSix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            lol. Yeah no y’all aren’t wrong by any stretch, and I doubt they’d really get rid of a lot of those power mods but the smaller subs? Sure. Also, give one of the regular people power-modding power and they could, theoretically, have normal function resuming inside a week. It’d still be a huge mess, though.

            Either way, I’m sure there’s an admin script available to mass-remove or ban, though that’d be a really drastic move on their part. The bluff call’s far more likely. Be interesting to see what they do regarding the large subs and their mods, though.