• Jordan Lund
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    that things that are essential, like food and health, should not depend on money exchange to be provided, period.

    The problem with that is the people providing the food and health services still need to survive.

    Doctors need to pay their rent. Farmers need to buy feed, seed, and fertilizer. Everyone pays for water.

    So once you go down the road of making it impossible to charge for services that need to bring in money to literally keep the lights on, you collapse the economy, and no, that’s NOT a good thing. That road leads to chaos and death.

    • nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not saying doctors et all should not be paid for their work. I’m saying it should not depend on a money transaction on the afflicted citizen. I think it’s perfectly feasible to, for example, have the State pay for things that are essential, it’s kind of the entire role of the State after all. Or even better, give doctors and providers of those services the same treatment as in not collecting from them for stuff.

      Also, if there’s such things as “companies Too Big To Fail should be handed over to the State”, then that also applies to Tasks Too Big To Fail. Like, you know, keeping your citizens alive. I insist: the core task of the State is to keep the Country alive.

      If that collapses the economy, IMO that’s an indicative that the economy model is not good, or perhaps even unethical.