It seems like rumours and suspicions have solidified today. So I was genuinely interested to see who was presenting the 10 o’clock news this evening – and how the current BBC-related story was covered.

  • @Arrakis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I wouldn’t think there would be a reason to proceed if the victim says they aren’t actually a victim (but I don’t know much about law!). I don’t imagine The Sun would have cared about “seeking justice” or whatever the parents say they want, only the sniff of sellable pseudo-scandal.

    • Leraje
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I honestly wouldn’t trust The Sun if they reported grass was green.

      I’d assume the Police will at least want to interview the young man but if he continues to deny it all I guess we’ll never hear the man officially be named.

        • Leraje
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I mean, at the end of the day a middle aged man having a relationship with a 17yo is at best a bit icky. Maybe not illegal though, depending on who’s version of events you believe.

    • Bleeping Lobster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      The police will almost certainly be salivating at the prospect of being able to wash their hands of another case. From a recent experience involving my dad (a disabled pensioner with cancer) being attacked, they just don’t give a shit if there’s even a hint of complication. “Ehhhh not really my problem, paperwork too much hassle” kind of attitude.

    • Hogger85b
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not saying anything at all even happened …but if somthing did, soliciting a minor (under18) is illegal even if the victim “consents” the law says they can’t. Like you can’t volunteer to be murdered.

      • @Arrakis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Isn’t it only soliciting a minor when they’re under the age of consent (16)? From what I’ve read on this story, the only crime is the creation of images since they weren’t legally an adult at 17. (I could be wrong though!)

        • Hogger85b
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ianal but think it is 18 if any sort of payment is involved…also if taking pictures is involved.

          It’s a stupid paradox of UK law that you can have sex at 16 but not send a picture until 18

          So if they were just in a relationship with no payments and no pictures it would be legal.