I feel that this is what we should be using instead of the current illogical time system.

  • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A dozenal system is more difficult in multiplication. Decimal: 10^7 =10000000, 10^8=100000000, 10^9=1000000000, etc.
    Dozenal: 12^7= 35831808, 12^8=429981696, 12^9=5159780352.
    Gets very messy very quick.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Since we can count to “10” (12) on one hand, we can use the other hand to count sets of “10”, bringing us up to “100” (144). With decimal, we’re stuck at 20, and that’s only if we’re wearing sandals.

              • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                If you’re pointing to the last phalange on both hands, that would be “110” (156) though wouldn’t it. Since it would be “10” x “10” + “10”.
                We could also use this method to count to 100 in base-10 using only the first 10 phalanges of the hand.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      In dozenal (duodecimal), 6+6= a dozen, but we write “dozen” as “10”. A dozen dozen is not 144; it is “100”. 3 dozen is not 36; 3 dozen is “30”.

      We would have two additional digits between 9 and “10”.

      We would have to rewrite our multiplication table entirely. 2 * 6=10. 3 * 6=16. 4 * 6=20. But, when we do memorize the new table, it is just as consistent and functional as our decimal system.