redimk@lemmy.fmhy.ml to Antiwork/Work Reform@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoDon't know if this content belongs here, but I just think this is awful in so many levels.www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1111 cross-posted to: futurology@chat.maiion.comfrance@lemmy.worldtech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.worldworkreform@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1111external-linkDon't know if this content belongs here, but I just think this is awful in so many levels.www.theverge.comredimk@lemmy.fmhy.ml to Antiwork/Work Reform@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square48fedilink cross-posted to: futurology@chat.maiion.comfrance@lemmy.worldtech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.worldworkreform@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarearquebus_x@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoCopyright doesn’t cover elements that are not the product of human labor, which means it does not cover physical bodies or faces or voices or anything like that. What you’re describing falls under the classification of personality rights.
Copyright doesn’t cover elements that are not the product of human labor, which means it does not cover physical bodies or faces or voices or anything like that.
What you’re describing falls under the classification of personality rights.